No, go for the new bone is not necessary - it's not a dog, but only an elderly housekeeper Malcolm. Give the dog a bone and knock on the door.

Remove the one instance and return to the house of Malcolm. Having met at the entrance of the dog, go to the store and go to the far end - There is a barrel of bones. Go back to the car (over the bridge) and go left to the house of Malcolm. From a conversation with the hostess you will learn a little bit about who is Malcolm, and something - from the history of the castle. Come to the already familiar to you a real estate office, but go through the next door - is a shop of curiosities. Bring a book chest with the caption 'From Zoltan - Malcolm' and again travel to the city. Taking the desired object, unlock the door and go inside, then - the next door. Pull the key out of the lock with a nail and pull it out from under the door with the poker. The door in front of children locked with a key from the inside.

Now go to the castle, on the third floor. Peering as follows, you will see the nail, remove it with a hammer. This means something, so look in the hole left after the cataclysm. Sayras pull the mother of freedom, and she also complains that tore clothes. Take a fork and hook them some device which is more like a miniature lift Crane (in essence, is what he is), and then pull him in and hook it over Harriett. Phantasmagoria: A Puzzle of Flesh failed because of dumb writers and a director who didn't realize a large portion of their game was unnecessary and annoying.Climb the stairs to the deck. The above described puzzle is all fine and good, but the entire time I am doing this, I am asking myself, 'why didn't he just reach under the couch?' or 'why didn't he just move the couch', instead we have to rely on a basic logic puzzle that is stupid in order to get a wallet that would have taken 10 seconds otherwise. But your pet rat won't come out from under the couch, so you have to use a granola bar to lure him out to get your wallet to leave your apartment. If you search under your couch, you'll find your wallet, but in order to get your wallet, you need to use your pet rat. A great example is when you first play the game, before you leave your apartment you need to find your wallet. A number of the puzzles, while using loose logic are completely unnecessary. You simply have to slog through a mountain of garbage until you find the right action that will send you on your way. This wouldn't be so bad, if it weren't for the fact you have absolutely no context on what you are supposed to do next to actually progress the story line. While Phantasmagoria had interesting events and plot devices you can optionally reveal through the progress of the game, either during chapters or special events, A Puzzle of Flesh has a ton of content and events that all rely on worthless actions such as calling someone from a phone or flipping one of your co-workers the middle finger. Other terrible issue with the game is the amount of inane events in the game. I don't know if it's the layout of the rooms, the context sensitive areas for the arrows or the angles, but moving around in A Puzzle of the Flesh constantly feels painful. To begin with, the movement in the game is awful. This time around the backgrounds are much more realistic looking then the first game. As for the second game, A Puzzle of Flesh, it brings nothing new to the table and actually suffers from a lot of other problems. The original Phantasmagoria was a unique and interesting concept, the use of live actors superimposed on to game environments was just The original Phantasmagoria was a unique and interesting concept, the use of live actors superimposed on to game environments was just beginning to become a thing and that is part of where it's charm came from.

Phantasmagoria game deaths